Evergreen Scopri Toys Shop now Cloud Drive Photos CE Books Scopri Scopri Fire Shop Kindle Shop now DVD e Blu-ray Sport Shop now
AKA Shakespeare: A Scientific Approach to the Authorship... e oltre 1.000.000 di libri sono disponibili per Amazon Kindle . Maggiori informazioni
EUR 46,80
  • Tutti i prezzi includono l'IVA.
Disponibilità immediata.
Venduto e spedito da Amazon.
Confezione regalo disponibile.
AKA Shakespeare: A Scient... è stato aggiunto al tuo carrello
Ne hai uno da vendere?
Passa al retro Passa al fronte
Ascolta Riproduzione in corso... In pausa   Stai ascoltando un campione dell'edizione audio udibile.
Maggiori informazioni
Visualizza l'immagine

AKA Shakespeare: A Scientific Approach to the Authorship Question (Inglese) Copertina flessibile – 2 feb 2013

Visualizza tutti i formati e le edizioni Nascondi altri formati ed edizioni
Prezzo Amazon
Nuovo a partire da Usato da
Formato Kindle
"Ti preghiamo di riprovare"
Copertina flessibile, 2 feb 2013
EUR 46,80
EUR 46,80

Non è necessario possedere un dispositivo Kindle. Scarica una delle app Kindle gratuite per iniziare a leggere i libri Kindle sul tuo smartphone, tablet e computer.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

Per scaricare una app gratuita, inserisci l'indirizzo e-mail o il numero di cellulare.

Dettagli prodotto

Recensioni clienti

Non ci sono ancora recensioni di clienti su Amazon.it
5 stelle
4 stelle
3 stelle
2 stelle
1 stella

Le recensioni clienti più utili su Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 25 recensioni
32 di 36 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
Who Was Shakespeare, and How to Find Him 9 marzo 2013
Di Palo Alto Resident - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Copertina flessibile
Suppose there is a historical question you wish could be answered, but related facts are scattered in a variety of writings by various persons, and to make things worse, experts disagree on the answer. You suspect this is like the proverbial blind-men-and-elephant problem. Is there a new approach to getting agreement among the experts? The author of this book suggests there is and presents his approach in the form of a play, with four actors, directed to the question of who wrote the literature attributed to Shakespeare.

The approach is systematic. There are lively meetings in pleasant places with independent studies in between. There are two history-minded participants (Beatrice and Claudia) who are familiar with Shakespeare material and express their differing opinions on a list of key questions. One participant (Martin) is mathematically minded. His role is to provide a procedure for converting all of their opinions into final "degrees of belief" for the three candidates - The gentleman from Stratford, the Earl of Oxford, or "Somebody Else." And there is a genial chairman and host (James) who relaxes any tension with wine from his vineyard.

This is written as a do-it-yourself book. The basic procedure used by Martin is widely used to evaluate scientific questions, but readers need not fear the math. The book's website (aka-shakespeare.com) contains a wizard, Prospero by name, who enables each reader to find out his or her answer based on his or her replies to the various questions they all discuss.

AKA is an entertaining account of the fictional meetings that guide us to the authorship answer. However, there is an epistemological aspect to AKA. I suspect that the method it describes for evaluating subjective opinions is just as important as the answer, since it should be applicable to many questions. Thus, I highly recommend this book to any blind men faced with any elephant as well as those willing to entertain the specific question: who was Shakespeare?
13 di 14 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
good ideas but stilted language 4 maggio 2013
Di Engprof - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Formato Kindle Acquisto verificato
The author sets out to prove his point by putting his findings into scientific charts and graphs. While that part was a bit difficult for an English major, I understand why he did it, and he did a good job. It's a totally valid approach.

The problem: By making this a novel, he had characters speaking to one another. The conversations were contrived and written in such proper language I just never felt they were real conversations between real people. I was reminded of Mark Twain's critique of Fenimore Cooper's works and the falseness of his (Cooper's) characters' language.

I do believe that if the author had simply presented his theories in a nonfiction setting, this book could become a major sourcebook for the Oxfordian theory.

I recommend it, despite the language problem.
17 di 20 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
Scientific reasoning applied to literary mystery 19 marzo 2013
Di Jeffrey D. Scargle - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Copertina flessibile Acquisto verificato
Eminent scientist Peter Strurrock has pioneered in the application of sound reasoning to unlock scientific puzzles. This delightfully readable book takes the reader on an adventure, applying methods that have been developed for such problems to address the question of who actually wrote the body of literature normally called "the works of Shakespeare." The system of reasoning which is used is known at Bayesian statistical analysis. This technique provides answers to questions based on two things: (1) new evidence or data relevant to the question, and (2) one's prior knowledge and beliefs. The reader is led to consider the first in light of the second -- yielding an estimate of the probability of several authorship scenarios constructed (even allowing the computations to be preformed automatically on a web site) by the reader.
7 di 8 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
AKA Shakespeare: a scientific approach to the authorship question 11 luglio 2013
Di BJ Spittle - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Copertina flessibile
Peter Sturrock's innovative book provides not only an introduction to the Shakespeare authorship question but an opportunity, by use of an associated website, for the reader to calculate for himself or herself the probability of who the most likely author was.
Peter Sturrock has had a distinguished career in astrophysics and is Emeritus Professor of Applied Physics and Emeritus Director of the Center for Space Science and Astrophysics at Stanford University. After reading the entire sequence of Shakespeare's sonnets he wondered who wrote them? to whom they were addressed? and what they were all about? When he assumed the author was William Shakspere of Stratford-upon-Avon, he could find no sensible answers to the other two questions, despite reading books by Shakespeare scholars. He found that many arguments were presented by both the Shakspere-Is-Shakespeare advocates and the Shakspere-Is-Not-Shakespeare dissenters but that no one argument, either way, was conclusive. Eventually he realized that the question could best be resolved by weighing and combining many different pieces of evidence, a process he had thought about for some years and had developed into a method for studying pulsars.
A procedure, BASIN, developed first in 1973 for application to astrophysical problems, based on Bayes' Theorem, has been used that allows for the hypotheses needed to be analysed. An "INterface" is defined between the hypotheses and the data and BAyeS Theorem is applied to each side of the interface allowing the probabilities to be calculated. Degrees of belief (db) are the units used to express confidence in a hypothesis and a chart is given for the corresponding odds, e.g., 10 db is equivalent to odds of 10 to 1, that a hypothesis is true. The calculations are performed for the reader by "Prospero" at the website [...] with the password being given in the book.
The three hypotheses that are examined are that the author of the plays and poems, Shake*Speare, was (a) Stratford, the gentleman from Stratford-upon-Avon in Warwickshire, William Shakspere; (b) Oxford, Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford or (c) Ignotus, an unknown person.
Twenty-five items related to Shake*Speare are considered, e.g.,
1. Shake*Speare being lame at some time in his life;
2. The existence of records of Stratford's correspondence;
3. The existence of evidence that Stratford had a patron;
4. The existence of original manuscripts by Stratford;
5. The existence of evidence that Stratford possessed any books;
6. The level of education received by Shake*Speare;
7. The extent of travel in Italy by Shake*Speare;
8. The social status of Shake*Speare based on the plays;
9. The quality of Stratford's handwriting;
10. Whether the monument inscription in the Holy Trinity Church at Stratford-upon-Avon identifies Stratford as Shake*Speare;
11. Whether EVERE was secreted in the monument inscription as an encrypted message;
12. Whether the contributors to the First Folio of 1623 believed that Stratford was Shake*Speare;
13. The social status of Shake*Speare based on the sonnets;
14. The dedication to the sonnets contains one or more hidden messages.
The material is presented as a series of dialogues between four participants, James, Martin, Beatrice, and Claudia who meet at a vineyard in the Carmel Valley, California, USA, and other locations, who have different roles, respectively, of presenting the factual material, helping with the mathematical analysis, and advocating for Stratford and Oxford. Although within the confines of the book, one of the advocates necessarily gets the better of each argument, the reader is urged to ignore that and to make up his or her own mind concerning each issue. By entering their own assessments on the website the weighted rankings of the three candidates will be given.
The book does not require the reader to be an expert in any field to follow the debate and weigh the evidence. Students from any field may find it a helpful introduction to the Authorship question and to scientific thinking.
I recommend this pioneering book to, amongst others, those who share with Peter Sturrock a love of poetry and a fondness for attempting to solve problems--be they in mathematics, physics, electrical engineering, astrophysics, or what are euphemistically referred to as "anomalous phenomena"--coupled with a conviction that scientific thinking need not be restricted to scientific problems.
Bruce Spittle
5 di 5 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
Mixed Feelings about This Analysis 4 giugno 2013
Di Amazon Customer - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Formato Kindle Acquisto verificato
The book is interesting because of the fairly easy to understand use of probability to do attribution analysis. Unfortunately, the characters dialog in a way that feels completely unrealistic and artificial. The other problem for me was that the charts seem to be stretching the
material in an obvious way. The book essentially is twice as long (maybe three times as long) as it should be. Having read the book on De Vere, I was already a believer,but it was STILL interesting
to see the probabilistic approach. I will probably do more reading about the issue since there were issues brought up in this book that I hadn't encountered before. I recommend the book, I just wish it were more concise and that the author wouldn't use the dialog approach.