oppure
Accedi per attivare gli ordini 1-Click.
Altre opzioni di acquisto
Ne hai uno da vendere? Vendi i tuoi articoli qui
Ci dispiace. Questo articolo non è disponibile in
Immagine non disponibile per
Colore:

 
Dillo alla casa editrice.
Vorrei leggere questo libro su Kindle

Non hai un Kindle? Scopri Kindle, oppure scarica l'applicazione di lettura Kindle GRATUITA.

Attempt at a Critique of All Revelation [Copertina rigida]

Johann Gottlieb Fichte , Allen Wood , Garrett Green

Prezzo: EUR 51,58 Spedizione gratuita. Dettagli
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Disponibilità: solo 2 --ordina subito (ulteriori in arrivo).
Venduto e spedito da Amazon. Confezione regalo disponibile.
Vuoi riceverlo mercoledì 30 aprile? Ordina entro e scegli la spedizione 1 giorno. Dettagli

Formati

Prezzo Amazon Nuovo a partire da Usato da
Copertina rigida EUR 51,58  
Copertina flessibile EUR 19,91  

Dettagli prodotto

ARRAY(0xa689b6fc)

Vendi la versione digitale di questo libro nel Kindle Store

Se sei un editore o un autore e detieni i diritti digitali di un libro, puoi vendere la versione elettronica nel Kindle Store. Maggiori informazioni

Recensioni clienti

Non ci sono ancora recensioni di clienti su Amazon.it
5 stelle
4 stelle
3 stelle
2 stelle
1 stella
Le recensioni clienti più utili su Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 5.0 su 5 stelle  2 recensioni
1 di 1 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
5.0 su 5 stelle Nice 2 marzo 2011
Di Philonous - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato:Copertina flessibile
I really enjoyed this book because it really did remind me of Kant. However Fichte sucessfully tackled the topic of divine revelation by using Kant's moral philosophy including Fichte's own form of egoism (not to be confused with narcissism or psychological egoism). Fichte believes that we cannot prove the empirical validity of divine revelations (since such revelations is in the realm of noumena) but instead of confirming the validity of them Fichte proposes that we decide which divine revelations are acceptable as divine revelations on the basis of morality (in the Kantian sense). Strangely, Fichte did not believe that people have to depend on divine revelations to be moral but people who do depend on narratives or stories to guide their moral compass should be receptive to divine revelations. The problem I find with this general argument is that it seems to be missing the point of what the bible means to Christians in general; while I do agree that many Christians depend on the bible for moral guidance, those very same Christians depend on the bible for other reasons such as spiritual growth and intimate communication with God (I personally find these reasons to be dubious but I am merely stating how Christians generally see their bible). Fichte seems to be using the Kantian version of Occam's Razor to take out a lot of narratives that appear immoral, but the problem is that by doing this it seems too similar with what Thomas Jefferson is doing to the bible (Thomas Jefferson took everything out accept some of the sayings of Jesus). Not that I am personally against what Fichte is implying but the consequence of applying such measures seems to be counter-productive because it backfires what was originally intended. If not much of the bible (which Fichte presumes to be a form of divine revelation) is left due to Fichte-Kant's Razor, then it only seems to show that divine revelation does not say very much about morality but actually very little. Nonetheless I enjoyed this book for other reasons.
5.0 su 5 stelle This was an interesting personal view of Fichte's view on life 5 marzo 2013
Di R. Moore - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato:Copertina flessibile|Acquisto verificato Amazon
I bought this for my son who is a college student studying for his Master's in Philosophy. I peeked inside to see what Fichte had to say and enjoyed the excellent introduction about him. I read only parts of the book before giving it to my son, so I am really not qualified for a very informative review. But I have to say from what little I read, it seems that Fichte's contemporaries took issue with Fichte's personality as well as his views. He was a student of Kant and was continually compared to him but really had his own ideas. I sympathized with Fichte as he had a rather tortured existence brought on by his lack of tact in getting along with his fellow scholars. He defended his beliefs to the end, losing many past supporters along the way. Kant took no issue with him really and even helped him get his work published in the beginning of his career. Fichte was a German idealist and a brilliant thinker.

Ricerca articoli simili per categoria