- Copertina rigida: 250 pagine
- Editore: Nathan Carmody; 1 edizione (15 settembre 2012)
- Lingua: Inglese
- ISBN-10: 0954291115
- ISBN-13: 978-0954291112
- Peso di spedizione: 440 g
Megalithic Empire, The (Inglese) Copertina rigida – Illustrato, 15 set 2012
|Nuovo a partire da||Usato da|
It is most unusual, mingling deep insight with flippancy, like music constantly changing key, and could appear to be the work of madmen, were it not incredibly well documented and perfectly stitched together. I find myself agreeing with most of it, revelling in the debunking of idiotic mainstream and alternative theories, but being extremely annoyed about the other bits. --Howard Crowhurst, Carnac
<span id="span_contact_Locked_AW7VL2O7O886L" style="display: inline;">...an enjoyable and personal view of the past, linking together fields of enquiry which are not usually associated and encouraging a closer look at particular aspects of landscape. (Professor Ronald Hutton, Bristol)
The book certainly gave me much pause for thought, I suspect that several related reads will never be quite the same again.... I found this surprisingly refreshing, it's certainly rare - perhaps the freedom from a need to nod constantly to history enlivened the story-telling and style. (Nick Marchmont)
"hugely enjoyable and thought-provoking" (John Martineau, Wooden Books Ltd.)</span>
Not since Alexander Thom have such revolutionary ideas been put forward with such confidence! --The Megalithic Portal
You may not agree with some of the conclusions in this unusually erudite book, but it is so well-written and entertaining that it will leave you wondering whether these theories could explain a hitherto neglected area of megalithic studies the driving forces behind the prehistoric economy. --Paul Broadhurst, author of The Sun and the Serpent et al.
How did Ancient Britons move goods across the country without maps or signposts? How did tin from a Cornish mine find its way to a bronze foundry in Birmingham? The answer is that nobody knows, but a Wokingham author has put together a theory that pre-literate Megalithic man relied on an elaborate transport network linked by stone circles. Harriet Vered and her co-author Mick Harper s The Megalithic Empire seeks to explain how materials and products were moved around on a huge scale using menhirs, obelisks, chalk figures and other ancient landmarks as signposts. Mrs Vered, who lives in Goodings Close, concedes that their theory will be seen as controversial, particularly by geologists who maintain that features on Dartmoor, for example, are naturally occurring. She says: The tors could have been man made and that is quite controversial. The hypothesis is that the Cornish man leaves his mine and navigates through Cornwall using stone circles and tors on Dartmoor to Avebury stone circle, which is a sort of depot. It is on the Ridgeway which can be reached by any people in Britain without having to cross water. The illustrated book also claims that V-shaped landscape features are often aligned with another feature such as a standing stone, making them important navigational points of the Bronze and Iron Ages. Mrs Vered, who has a background in anthropology and languages and taught modern languages at Bracknell and Wokingham College, adds: I don t think that differences of opinion mean that people are right or wrong. A lot of these areas have been taken over by different schools of thought and I wish people would get together and pool their ideas. The Megalithic Empire, published by Mr Harper s publishing company Nathan Carmody, is available on Amazon. --http://www.getwokingham.co.uk/news/s/2120652_author_harriet_vered_tackles_ancient_mysteries_in_new_book
The 'megalithic empire' that Mick Harper and Harriet Vered envisage in their genial but provocative book extended to trade with the Mediterranean and Scandinavian regions and operated not only in the Bronze and Iron Ages but again in the so-called Dark Ages. And what would one expect, the authors of The Megalithic Empire ask, of a system that lasted for at least 3,000 years, and 'a cast of characters who were operating a supra-national organisation based on navigational instruments and measurements'? It is not in itself surprising that Megalithia, as they term it, would have developed an intellectual elite who encouraged a megalithic science based on surveying and astronomy. There is intensive debate, they rightly point out, both among academics and enthusiasts (but not, of course, between academics and enthusiasts) as to the worth and validity of that science.Read more at Suite101: --How the Stone Age Spawned a Megalithic Empire | Suite101.com http://suite101.com/article/how-the-stone-age-spawned-a-megalithic-empire-a411856#ixzz26pIKWsce
Non è necessario possedere un dispositivo Kindle. Scarica una delle app Kindle gratuite per iniziare a leggere i libri Kindle sul tuo smartphone, tablet e computer.
Per scaricare una app gratuita, inserisci l'indirizzo e-mail o il numero di cellulare.
Garanzia e recesso: Se vuoi restituire un prodotto entro 30 giorni dal ricevimento perché hai cambiato idea, consulta la nostra pagina d'aiuto sul Diritto di Recesso. Se hai ricevuto un prodotto difettoso o danneggiato consulta la nostra pagina d'aiuto sulla Garanzia Legale. Per informazioni specifiche sugli acquisti effettuati su Marketplace consulta… Maggiori informazioni la nostra pagina d'aiuto su Resi e rimborsi per articoli Marketplace.
Le recensioni clienti più utili su Amazon.com (beta)
The authors of the new book The Megalithic Empire, M.J. Harper and H.L. Vered, approach the problem of megaliths and other related phenomena by thinking a bit more carefully about their possibly practical purpose, forgetting (for the moment) any possible ritual significance. What they discover is that megaliths conveniently (and ingeniously) answer a very pressing pragmatic need, once you put yourself in the shoes of a prehistoric trader faced with the task of getting his product (the example they use is tin, a major British export in prehistory) to a buyer, traveling to some distant point over land without the aid of a map or written signposts. In short, the abundant standing stones, stone circles, menhirs, and various dikes and earthworks across Britain, along its coastlines, and in more far-flung locales with which pre-Roman Britain traded make perfect, beautifully simple sense as durable components of a comprehensive land- and sea-based wayfinding system that facilitated long-distance exchange of goods and people for thousands of years in the absence of literacy. Stonehenge, which certainly had an astronomical function, may have been the central observatory that calibrated the rest of the system.
Mainstream archaeologists don't dispute that Britain had major trade ties to the continent and the Mediterranean throughout the Bronze Age and before, but the practical particulars of moving goods around have generally been ignored. Few have grappled with the problems of conducting major trade in absence of writing and maps. By reconceiving of megaliths and prehistoric terraforming in terms of navigation and the moving of goods and animals over long distances, Harper and Vered fill this gap. In the process, they show that numerous details, not only of archaeology and geography but also of folklore, begin to make enormous sense as echoes of a pan-European trading society that needed to maintain the system with minimal labor and pay for its infrastructure and upkeep through the collecting of tolls. You'll never think about wishing wells, the location of pubs, or witches and their familiars the same way after reading this book. A lot of other conclusions and speculations also radiate from their central insights about "Megalithia Inc."--including some fascinating possibilities about the history of animal and plant domestication, the inside story of Celtic Christianity, and the true symbolic meaning of angels, to name just a few. The book is a goldmine of interesting ideas.
Harper, author of the equally dazzling Secret History of the English Language (published in Britain as The History of Britain Revealed) is sort of the "leader" of a small and intensely interesting group of outside-the-box, non- or para-academic revisionists calling themselves "applied epistemologists," whose snarky and endlessly fascinating trashings of received wisdom on everything from Beowulf to plate tectonics can be read and enjoyed at applied-epistemology.com. Their approach to debunking orthodoxy is based on ruthlessly applying a few simple assumptions to whatever question is at hand. When it comes to historical questions, assume that things in the past were the same as they are now, unless there's solid evidence they weren't. Historians make a living by telling stories, because stories are interesting--usually full of tumult and conflict and change--but the fact of the matter is that real history is more often than not dull. So, when it comes to historical evidence, ask: How do we really know? When you actually look at it, it turns out, a disturbing lot of what historians say (and I can vouch that it is the same in other fields) is either the parroting of unexamined orthodoxies or professionally motivated strategic overstatement ...when it is not outright fraud. On their site (and in his previous book) Harper and his friends show that when you actually trace much of orthodox history or linguistics, for example, back to its sources, you find that those sources, in many cases, were probable forgeries or hoaxes to begin with. Much of what we "know" about the history of pre-Renaissance Northern Europe is built ultimately on documents with very iffy provenance that always seem to have conveniently supported the particular national allegiences of the original owner or his patrons. Thus, much of what we "know" about the past is probably wrong--even wildly wrong.
Like a lot of revisionist history/archaeology, the hypothesis in The Megalithic Empire amounts to a version of "the ancients were cleverer than we give them credit." The key difference between their version of this story and the breathless "lost civilizations" fantasies spun by Graham Hancock and his ilk is that there is no whiff here of pareidola--seeing faces in clouds, or Orion's belt in the pyramids. (Well, the other key difference is, Harper and Vered are a lot funnier.) Yet The Megalithic Empire's proposal, and the picture of the ancient world that compellingly takes shape around it, is no less exciting. If they're right, Harper and Vered have "discovered" a pretty major secret about prehistory (and after) that is secret not because of conspiracy but simply because of silence and forgetting: Megalithia didn't use (and maybe even actively resisted) writing, so the only physical traces it left were in the landscape. This book offers a whole new way of seeing and reading that landscape--and on the book's website, themegalithicempire.com, the authors invite readers to test out the theory themselves by taking their own "megalithic walks" through the British countryside. If I lived there, I'd take up that challenge in a heartbeat.
Megalithic jobs meant agriculture, farming, industry and trade. Trade was the thread that ties the whole of megalithic life together, and that trading network was spread over thousands of miles of Europe, by land and by sea. The British Isles was a home for industry even 5,000 years ago, as people came from all over Europe for highly valuable metals like tin, copper, silver and gold, which were mined and refined here before being exported in exchange for other trade goods. Stories of this megalithic culture became legend as far away as Greece and Egypt.
The authors of Megalithic Empire have done a great job of turning the TAs perspective on its head in a highly informative and entertaining way, with an emphasis on how people found their way around in an area before printed maps as we know them.
Discussion of these topics can be found on the The Megalithic Empire website and forum.