Ne hai uno da vendere?
Passa al retro Passa al fronte
Ascolta Riproduzione in corso... In pausa   Stai ascoltando un campione dell'edizione audio udibile.
Maggiori informazioni
Visualizza tutte le 2 immagini

Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment (Inglese) Copertina flessibile – gen 1978


Visualizza tutti i formati e le edizioni Nascondi altri formati ed edizioni
Prezzo Amazon
Nuovo a partire da Usato da
Copertina flessibile
"Ti preghiamo di riprovare"
EUR 484,70 EUR 71,60
click to open popover

Non è necessario possedere un dispositivo Kindle. Scarica una delle app Kindle gratuite per iniziare a leggere i libri Kindle sul tuo smartphone, tablet e computer.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

Per scaricare una app gratuita, inserisci il numero di cellulare.




Dettagli prodotto

Recensioni clienti

Non ci sono ancora recensioni di clienti su Amazon.it
5 stelle
4 stelle
3 stelle
2 stelle
1 stella

Le recensioni clienti più utili su Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 2.2 su 5 stelle 16 recensioni
160 di 199 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
5.0 su 5 stelle Americas new director of science and technology policy 29 gennaio 2010
Di Oliver Switch - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Copertina flessibile
Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens.

The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States? Or both?

These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology -- informally known as the United States' Science Czar. In this book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:

* Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;

* The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;

* Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;

* People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.

* A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.

Impossible, you say? That must be an exaggeration or a hoax. No one in their right mind would say such things. [...]
43 di 53 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
1.0 su 5 stelle This is your wake up call... 3 gennaio 2013
Di John - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Copertina flessibile Acquisto verificato
I have been deeply concerned about so-called 'environmentalism' for some time now, about what I could sense was an 'anti human' mindset that seemed to occupy so many of these people.

I watched some YouTube video's where this work is discussed by Webster Tarpley and thought that I would obtain this book myself and read it.

My copy of this book arrived a few weeks ago and I spent several weekends reading every word, chapter and recommendation.

I must admit, this is one of the most deeply disturbing, horrifying texts I have ever read.

Simply put, this book describes a future vision for the world that now exists within China; a world of forced sterilisations, forced abortions, eugenics, incredibly powerful central governments, carbon taxes, poisoned food and water supplies pumped full of highly toxic sterilisation agents...the list goes on and on. The book reads like some crazed Nazi fantasy, what is even more horrifying is that it was written and openly published in academia by people such as Holden whom now hold such highly esteemed positions in government and academia.

The environmental movement has morphed into a hard-core Malthusian Eugenics movement that sees humanity as the ultimate enemy of the planet, something to be managed and - where necessary - culled.

If you have ever wanted to know the deepest thoughts of the environmental movement, then this book lays them all bare for you to read.

This book is your wake up call.
41 di 51 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
1.0 su 5 stelle Obama loves me? 22 marzo 2014
Di Ronald P. - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Copertina flessibile
It staggers me how people can be apologists for this filthy peice of scum Holdren, and his best pal Obama. There is no overpopulation problem you idiot commenters! In most nations the reproductive rate is well below what is nessicary to sustain a population. If you truly believe we have an overpopulation problem, do us a favor and start with removing yourselves from the equation. That shouldn't be a problem right, I mean if it's such a big issue? This agenda is well under way, with GMO's, fluoride in the water, vaccines (watch Bill Gate's "innovating to zero" he says, "if we do a really good job" then references abortions and vaccines). And you idiots, like the commenter talking about how Holdren was a "young acidemic" when he wrote this love letter to Mengele. Do you actually believe when Holdren references poor gene pools he isn't talking about you as well? We're all in this together you're not part of the 0.1%, Ted Turner says "95% of people should be killed" that's you, and everyone you know and ever will know. The truth of the matter is that people like Gates, Holdren, Turner, Sanger, Royal family, Rothchild's aren't only degenerate but have been inbred for many generations. When a horribly inbred immoral individual such as Holdren observes the tenacity and will to thrive that exists in us "low born individuals" they conflagrate with evny. As a result if that envy, we get to read treatises on criminal insanity such as the Democratic party's seminal "Eco Science". Believe what you will, I always recomend one to always follow your instincts as I do. If you continue to believe Obama loves you and cares about your well being you need only read the writing of the man who's "Council he looks forward to".
41 di 54 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
1.0 su 5 stelle Eugenics under new names: malthusianism and ecology 3 dicembre 2011
Di Dalton C. Rocha - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Copertina flessibile
Here in Brazil, I tried to read online this trash-book. This book support not just abortion, but its imposition to women with undesirable characters; mainly poverty. Beyond doubt this is a Eugenics' book, book but Eugenics has new names in this book: malthusianism and ecology. In this trash-book, "Inferior race" is called "over population" and Eugenics is called malthusianism and ecology.
82 di 116 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
1.0 su 5 stelle EVIL, EVIL, EVIL! 8 dicembre 2009
Di s. wright - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Copertina flessibile
This is from a World Net Daily article written by Jerome S. Corsi,

Holdren co-authored with Malthusian population alarmist Paul R. Ehrlich and Ehrlich's wife, Anne. The authors argued involuntary birth-control measures, including forced sterilization,
may be necessary and morally acceptable under extreme conditions, such as widespread famine brought about by "climate change."

On page 786, the authors wrote that one way to discourage illegitimate childbearing "might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption - especially those born to minors who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone."

Alternatively, the authors suggested unwed mothers might place their babies up for adoption, writing: "If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it."

While observing that government-imposed coercive measures should be considered "only if milder measures fail completely," the authors acknowledged extreme ecological situations could justify governmental intervention with coercive population control measures.

"It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society," they write.

The authors' wish to control births to unwed and teenage mothers appears to derive from their concern that overpopulation leads to "general social deterioration."

For instance, on page 838, they wrote the following: "If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility - just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns - providing they are not denied equal protection." (Italics in original text.)

Nor do the authors see any constitutional protection for the right to bear children.

"Some people - respected legislators, judges, and lawyers included - have viewed the right to have children as a fundamental and inalienable right," the authors continued on page 838. "Yet neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution mentions a right to reproduce."

In a similar fashion, the authors argued that a right to privacy did not extend to an unlimited right to have children, elaborating on page 838 that, "Where the society has a 'compelling, subordinating interest' in regulating population size, the right of the individual may be curtailed. If society's survival depended on having more children, women could be required to bear children, just as men can constitutionally be required to serve in the armed forces. Similarly, given a crisis caused by overpopulation, reasonably necessary laws to control excessive reproduction could be enacted."

The article goes on. You all get the point. Don't take my word for it, research yourself!!
This stuff is real and they (the Globalists) DO WANT YOU DEAD!

Ricerca articoli simili per categoria