Ne hai uno da vendere?
Passa al retro Passa al fronte
Ascolta Riproduzione in corso... In pausa   Stai ascoltando un campione dell'edizione audio udibile.
Maggiori informazioni
Visualizza tutte le 3 immagini

United States History: Preparing for the Advanced Placement Examination (Inglese) Copertina flessibile – gen 2003


Visualizza tutti i formati e le edizioni Nascondi altri formati ed edizioni
Prezzo Amazon
Nuovo a partire da Usato da
Copertina flessibile, gen 2003
EUR 52,05

C'è una nuova edizione di questo articolo:

click to open popover

Descrizione prodotto

Book by John J Newman John M Schmalbach

Non è necessario possedere un dispositivo Kindle. Scarica una delle app Kindle gratuite per iniziare a leggere i libri Kindle sul tuo smartphone, tablet e computer.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

Per scaricare una app gratuita, inserisci il numero di cellulare.



Dettagli prodotto

Recensioni clienti

Non ci sono ancora recensioni di clienti su Amazon.it
5 stelle
4 stelle
3 stelle
2 stelle
1 stella

Le recensioni clienti più utili su Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 2.1 su 5 stelle 666 recensioni
453 di 560 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
1.0 su 5 stelle REVISIONIST HISTORY - war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength 16 settembre 2013
Di Akasha - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Copertina flessibile
At the very least, the bill of rights is completely revised, so if you read this, as your source of information, you have no idea what the ORIGINAL Bill of Rights states.

Is this an accident? Probably not. Have you read 1984?

That this kind of book is allowed to be published is a crime. The author is a traitor to the Constitution.
438 di 544 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
1.0 su 5 stelle disinformation and indoctrination 16 settembre 2013
Di doug - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Copertina flessibile
This book gives a breif synopsis onf our bill of rights. This is quoting how they explain the 2nd ammendment. "The people have a right to bare arms in a state militia."
This goes against every supreme court decision on the meaning of the second ammendment. As the first line of the 2nd is actually a preamble. Popular in writings of that time. This book has very little real history inside. Its mostly just a progessive indoctrination peice...
28 di 32 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
1.0 su 5 stelle 1 because you can'd to 0. 16 settembre 2013
Di Michael J. Burke - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Copertina flessibile
Any so called 'text book' that substantially alters the text of one of the constitutional amendments, is a book that belongs in Soviet era Russia, not a US 'advanced placement' curriculum. Any parent that purchases this book for their child is doing them and their nation a great disservice.
35 di 41 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
1.0 su 5 stelle Omits/denies/contradicts? controlling case law on 2nd Amendment 17 settembre 2013
Di Alwin - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Copertina flessibile
[...]

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL. v. HELLER (2008)

"Held:
1.
The Second Amendment protects
an individual right to possess a
firearm unconnected with service in
a militia, and to use that arm for
traditionally lawful purposes, such
as self-defense within the home.
Pp. 2-53."

This was ruled on 2 years before the 2010 revision. Are we reviewing the 1st edition (1998), or did the 2010 revision have the same BS summary of the most important inherent and also enumerated human/civil/constitutional right (transcribed from a picture of page 102 of the book below)?

"The people have the right to keep and bear arms in a state militia."
16 di 17 persone hanno trovato utile la seguente recensione
1.0 su 5 stelle Dumbing down of America 17 settembre 2013
Di Dov Neidish - Pubblicato su Amazon.com
Formato: Copertina flessibile
The Constitution isn't so long or complicated that the authors could not have included it in it's entirety.
That they chose to change the wording and therefore the meaning of the 2nd Amendment to suit their own political bias should be enough to make one wary of this book. Who knows however how many other examples of revisionist history are in this book? I would hate for my child (who is an AP history student) to use this tripe.

Ricerca articoli simili per categoria